Download Members: $0.00 Non‑Members: $75.00 |
Buy Now |
Publication Details
Published Date: | |
---|---|
Authors: | Jim Clark, Giles Gaskell |
Company: | CMSC |
Print Format: | Technical Paper |
Citation: | Jim Clark, Giles Gaskell, "Prototype Metrology: How Accurate Is 3D Printing?," The Journal of the CMSC, Vol. 11, No. 1, Spring 2016 |
Abstract
As additive manufacturing technology improves, a growing number of companies are investigating the potential of utilizing three-dimensional (3D) printing for creating production parts. Additive manufacturing processes give companies the ability to create parts with geometry that cannot be produced through traditional manufacturing. This article outlines metrology techniques for inspecting rapid prototypes containing complex geometry and summarizes test measurement results on a series of parts, using a variety of mainstream 3D printing processes. The use of 3D printing for manufacturing parts allows engineers to design parts that are challenging to inspect. This article describes 3D scanning and industrial computed tomography (CT) techniques for measuring and inspecting parts with complex surfaces, parts without prismatic or datum features, and parts with internal geometry. For many companies, it is unclear how accurately parts can be produced using 3D printing. There are a large number of additive manufacturing machines and processes available on the market, each with its own unique capabilities. Much like injection molding and other manufacturing processes, the accuracy of 3D printing can also vary depending on the nature of the part. This article summarizes the results of two tests. In the first test, the same part is produced using eight different additive manufacturing processes. The eight parts are 3D scanned and compared to the original computed-aided design (CAD) model. In the second test, a part is 3D printed in two different orientations. Both parts are scanned and compared to the original CAD model. Dimensional reports from both tests are described herein.